Book Review: Eye of the Moonrat (The Bowl of Souls #1) by Trevor H. Cooley

 photo Eye of the Moonrat The Bowl of Souls 1 by Trevor H. Cooley.jpg
Title: Eye of the Moonrat
Written By: Trevor H. Cooley
Series: The Bowl of Souls #1
Categories: young adult, adventure, magic, fantasy, coming of age.
Read: 26th February, 2017 – 18th April, 2017
Rating: 3 / 5
Obtained: Amazon.com.au
Cross posted Review to: Goodreads, Amazon.com.au, and Booklikes.

Justan is the son of a powerful warrior, Faldon the Fierce, someone he admires greatly. In his studies, to become a soldier, he lacks the necessary grades to graduate the training school and ends up being held back a further year. He is given a special tutor and we see him grow into a powerful opponent. Elsewhere, there are some important events happening in the world, several which might affect Justan in his journeys.

In the beginning, I found Justan to be a bit unbearable; he had a poor attitude. It kind of felt as if he didn’t want to be in the academy, despite his desperation to be there. He had complaints about almost all of the training. If he were being forced there, I could understand his problems, but he was the one who wanted to be attending the academy. He also treated others poorly and had little respect towards his mentors. However, after what you might call a “training montage”, he became somewhat more grateful to people and came to respect his mentors. He came to appreciate the training. I even found it quite interesting that he took much of the advice, despite still being sceptical of it. For example, the tuition in archery. Whilst he mocked the teacher for being whimsical and the lessons never amounting to anything, he actually took the advice of the teacher and found it helped.

I think Ma’am seems overly violent and angry sometimes. For example, though it’s only hearsay/ gossip, in chapter 17; one character notes that he almost got hit by her for simply asking her name. By no means is that the only event of her ill temper; it’s just one example. Kenn Dollie is one of two bullies against Justan. He, in Justan’s words is a “buffoon who fancied himself Academy material”. He mocks Kenn for failing a test. However, I thought that to be a bit hypocritical; he’s doing poorly in his own studies, so I feel that he has no right to judge. I felt that much of Kenn’s part in the book was a tad unnecessary and silly. The same can be said for Benjo, though it was obvious that he was somehow being manipulated by Kenn. Yes, Kenn turned out to be a violent, inappropriate person. However, a lot of his actions just didn’t make sense. He spent a lot of time obsessed with trying to get Justan to fail in studies. However, he must be wasting a ridiculous amount of time doing this, plus he was ruining his own reputation. It just doesn’t seem worthwhile to commit such offenses; you’re just wasting your own time. I just don’t understand why Kenn, Benjo, or anyone else, would bother with such revenge.

I think there were just too many characters overall; after the training academy bit is done, Justan heads off on another adventure and meets a whole lot more characters. In my notes of the book, there are far too many characters that we meet once or twice and then never witness again. After the training school, I lost track of the people Justan meets. Plus, we have alternating storylines with other characters intertwined. Much of it seemed a tad inane to me. Yes, I do appreciate that each of these people has their own feelings on situations, as well as personal problems. However, a lot of it just took away from the main plot lines. There were a lot of important items to consider as well; a lot of weapons and artefacts are bestowed with importance. Many of which don’t really have much part to play in the book. There was a lot of plot to get through, if I can be blunt. The author introduced a lot of storylines. Whilst they’re obviously going to be finished later on in the series, it just kind of seems a little disappointing that so much goes left unexplained for now.

Plus, a lot of scenes were kind of awkward and unnecessary. For example, Justan’s mother gives him a pair of rings. It’s meant to seem like a really important moment and these rings are obviously family heirlooms. Yet, several hours after this, he gives one away. It kind of made him seem ungrateful. I also didn’t feel as if the moonrats lived up to their titular connection. Yes, there were moonrats involved in the book, but I didn’t feel that they were important enough to name the entire book after them.

I would also like to point out that I’m not sure that the age group is accurate. In several portions, there are some quite violent scenes. Justan loses fingers and even becomes paralysed in some portions. Though he gets healed with the help of magic, I feel like some of the scenes are a bit too mature for some people.

Overall, I’m glad that I stayed with the book and didn’t give up- as I had been considering; due to Justan’s initial poor attitude. I feel as if he had a really good personality change; he found a lot of respect for others. I think that it’s a fairly original book and the author has given thought to the backgrounds and motives of many characters.

However, I don’t think that I would purchase another book in the series. Book one was fairly good, but I just feel like it’s a bit too complex for me. I think there are just too many people and a lot of plot to keep track of. I appreciate that he keeps going places and meeting new people, but I sometimes found it a bit difficult to follow. Especially considering that much of it felt a bit irrelevant to me.

I’m choosing to rate this book three stars. I feel like it was fairly well developed, but it’s not the type of book that I can easily flip through. I might re-read it later on in the future, just to see whether I can appreciate it more later on.

I obtained a free copy from Amazon.com.au and this is an honest review.

Source:
www.goodreads.com/review/show/1929310274?

Original post:
Cattereia.booklikes.com/post/1553917/book-review-eye-of-the-moonrat-the-bowl-of-souls-1-by-trevor-h-cooley

Advertisements

Book Review: Engella By Paul Ian Cross


 photo Engella By Paul Ian Cross.jpg
Title: Engella
Written By: Paul Ian Cross
Illustrated By: Alison Rasmussen
Series: The Engella Chronicles
Categories: children’s fiction, kid’s book, adventure, future, past, time travel, science fiction.
Read: 14th April, 2017
Rating: 3 / 5
Obtained: Amazon.com.au, Smashwords

Crossposted Review to: Goodreads, Amazon.com.au, Smashwords, Booklikes.

We first meet Engella in New Shanghai. The year is 2074 and she’s living on the streets. She’s on the run from the authorities and, when she’s about to get caught, she activates a device which launches her through time. She finds herself in Scotland, the year being 1998. Annys is an elderly lady, walking her dog, Rupert. She takes Engella into her home.

Both Engella and Annys are reasonably interesting characters. There’s obviously a lot of back story to either of them. However, seeing as it’s a short story, it feels like a lot of details are missing or simply crammed in, without fully explaining points to the reader. For example, when Engella and Annys meet. Annys simply accepts Engella into her home and they have an in-depth conversation. This would be a fantastic opportunity to introduce us further to either character. However, the author skims over the events and it feels like it was kind of a wasted opportunity. The same can be said of the rest of the story. The setting and scenes, for example; I don’t think we get a reasonable explanation as to why either Engella is being chased by the authorities. It’s also a bit mystifying as to why she has some sort of time device; I think they ought to go to highly trained people and not teenagers. Especially considering the effects of time and how it might change future periods if someone were to change the past. However, I suppose a lot of that might be a bit too complex for a kid’s book.

Another thing I’ve been considering is that there’s nothing really special (for lack of a better word) about either time area. We visit both New Shanghai or Scotland in the book, but I don’t feel like there’s much to take in at either location. We don’t get to take in much scenery and the author doesn’t give much explanation about the qualities of either place. I feel like this is difficult to explain. Think about if you were to travel to appear in a random city, in any time period, and find yourself in an alleyway. What year is it and what city are you in? Can you tell this from your surroundings? It wouldn’t always be likely. The same if you were to appear on some random beach; you mightn’t be able to tell the year you are in. I feel like this is where the time travel aspects fall short. In both these cases, we know we’re in a certain place and in a certain year. However, if we weren’t told such things, it mightn’t be obvious. If the author skipped telling us the date and place, it could even be the same year, in the same city (possibly connected to a beach), where Engella comes across a Scottish person.

The illustrations are by Alison Rasmussen and very well done. They’re very detailed and obviously took a lot of effort on her part. The first is the cover image and I like the delicate colours. I also like the simplicity. The second is of a cat; it’s my favourite of the drawings as it’s very adorable. A third is of Engella and a fourth image is of Rupert, the dog.

It’s a fairly original book, but I think we miss out on a lot of the important back-story and details. It has a great premise. I think it would get a lot of kids interested in time travel and science fiction. It’s a short story of only ~3,700 words. However, it ends sort of abruptly and will be continued in the autumn of 2017. I don’t think I would necessarily buy the next story in the series; it’s just a bit too short and doesn’t have a proper conclusion. Plus, I would likely then need to pay for the story after if it also has a cliff-hanger ending. I might consider purchasing it if it were novel length.

I obtained free copies of this book from Smashwords and Amazon.com.au. This is an honest review.

You can get your own copy of the book from these sites (as of right now, 14/04/2017): Amazon.com, Amazon.com.au, Smashwords, PaulIanCross.co.uk (the author’s website).

However, please be aware that this is likely for a limited time. Please double check the price before purchasing!

Source:
www.goodreads.com/review/show/1971314301?

Original post:
Cattereia.booklikes.com/post/1552623/book-review-engella-by-paul-ian-cross

Book Review: The Everywhere Bear by Julia Donaldson

 photo The Everywhere Bear by Julia Donaldson.jpg
Written By: Julia Donaldson
Illustrated By: Rebecca Cobb
Categories: Kid’s book, teddy bear, adventure, children, short story
Read: 31st March, 2017
Rating: 5 / 5
Obtained: Hip Little One (Giveaway)
Cross posted Review to: Goodreads, Booklikes
In “The Everywhere Bear” by Julia Donaldson and illustrated by Rebecca Cobb we get to take a look in a school. We visit Class One, led by Mrs. McAllister. Not only are there a bunch of great kids in the class, they have a very special friend- the Everywhere Bear. He sits on a shelf and he gets to go and have adventures with each kid. On one journey, he accidentally gets lost and we experience him going on an adventure that no one could have predicted.
One of the things I appreciate most is that each child is different. There are a variety of characters to relate to, each with differing appearance and hobbies. I really like that the Everywhere Bear gets to play with each of his friends differently. The text features a lot of rhyming which makes the story quite fun and I feel like it’s very encouraging to try new things.
The illustrations are great! They give the readers a great view about the town and community. From the classroom to the sea, there are all sorts of brilliant scenes for us to view. We get see a lot of the action and, even though he’s only a little bear, the Everywhere Bear sure goes on an amazing adventure!
Overall, I really enjoyed it. It’s a lovely little story with literal highs and lows. I’m sure that any child will love this!
I was lucky enough to receive a free copy of this book thanks to Hip Little One & Pan Macmillan, but this is still an honest review.

Source:
www.goodreads.com/review/show/1957658457

Original post:
Cattereia.booklikes.com/post/1547894/book-review-the-everywhere-bear-by-julia-donaldson

Book Review: Dead and Breakfast (Cayo Hueso Mystery #1) by Kimberly G. Giarratano

Dead and Breakfast - Kimberly G. Giarratano

Title: Dead and Breakfast
Series: Cayo Hueso Mystery #1
By: Kimberly G. Giarratano
Categories / Themes: Mystery, paranormal, ghost, young adult, angst
Read: 21st February – 25th February, 2017
Rating: 1 / 5
Obtained: Kindle Scout (Nominated)
Crossposted Review to: Goodreads, Booklikes, Amazon

Dead and Breakfast (Cayo Hueso Mystery #1) by Kimberly G. Giarratano is about a small hotel, the Dead and Breakfast, which is marketed to people who are interested in knowing about its haunted past. Autumn Abernathy and Liam Breyer both work there. Autumn is someone who has become accustomed to the ghosts. She can see and communicate with them. However, it’s Liam’s first day and, unfortunately for him, one of the ghosts has taken a dislike to him. Throughout the book, both teenagers try to uncover the mystery behind this unfriendly apparition. The excerpt on the Kindle Scout website is what first drew me to the book. I liked the introduction of the characters and the welcoming to the Dead and Breakfast. However, much like the events in the plot, things took a turn once I actually began reading past the excerpt after I received my copy. This review is kind of lengthy and opinionated, just to warn you.

Autumn and Liam are the two narrators of the plot and it switches back and forth between them.

Liam isn’t the most interesting person on the planet, but he has some good thoughts here and there. The relationship between Liam and Autumn is pretty bad and somewhat cringe worthy. There are a lot of tacky areas where others keep on telling them not to be together; Autumn’s mother and Victoria both have problems with it. Though neither have particular reason to be upset with the relationship. For Autumn’s mother, it’s pretty much just meant to seem like she doesn’t want Liam turning out like her own ex-husband, though she’s no reason to think it. With Victoria, the only real reason we’re given is jealousy; which doesn’t make much sense either. It’s a fairly typical “love” story and it kind of feels like they’re just together because the author has deemed it so. I don’t sense much real relationship, or get the feeling that they even like being in each other’s company. The most cringe worthy moment is late in the book where, for no reason, there’s one of those scenes where the antagonist kisses Liam and then Autumn walks in. I hate those moments in media; it’s just a bit where one character is meant to be making another one jealous. However, Autumn was already plenty jealous of her. It’s all really generic.

Autumn’s parents have recently divorced. Autumn was brought to the Dead and Breakfast by her mother, from where they had lived in New Jersey. Autumn is desperate to return there. She longs for the memories she had there whilst growing up and would love to return to that happy point in life. She’s miserable here at the hotel. It definitely shows in the entirety of the story. She’s a somewhat hateful person. In the beginning, I understood it as a general dislike for her position. However, later on, I realise that she’s just a spiteful person in general. No matter what goes on, there’s just so much she dislikes, and she’s just so angry all the time. She goes about the place and deliberately antagonises people she dislikes.

There are a few antagonists, but Victoria is pretty much the primary one. She’s… Not very original. She’s your generic mean girl. Realistically there isn’t much reason to hate her, in my opinion, but the author keeps on trying to thrust this opinion on us. Characters keep on implying that Victoria is a terrible person because she’s rich and beautiful. Nothing wrong with either but, for some reason, that’s cause enough for people to look down on her. So, basically it’s just others being jealous of her. Just because she has money and her grandfather is an important person, doesn’t mean that we should hate her, despite what the author is trying to imply. Another reason given, in Autumn’s case, is that she doesn’t like her because she thinks Victoria is entitled. One example, soon after we meet her, is that Victoria asks for Autumn’s class notes because of a quiz and Autumn internally mocks her for not doing well in classes. Really, this just makes me look upon Autumn more negatively; she’s just bullying someone who’s looking for genuine help with school work. I’d like to point out that Victoria didn’t actually seem that entitled to me. She hosted a party for her friends. Though it had a cover charge, that money went to charity. She even offered Liam money to help him start a business. Sure, it had strings attached, but at least she was giving him an opportunity. Really, I can sort of see why we’re meant to dislike her. There is the basis for demanding and selfish behaviour. However, the majority of situations where she’s involved/ mentioned are scenes where Autumn and Liam are bullying her. They make fun of her behind her back, mocking her for not being smart or for her appearance. Things like that. I’d like to comment here that there was some negative behaviour on Victoria’s part, such as pushing Autumn in the pool. That’s obviously not acceptable, but nor is Autumn and Liam’s behaviour. Yes, she does make fun of the hotel for being haunted, but Autumn does it more than Victoria does. Autumn absolutely loathes the place, so why should she care about some random thinking it as haunted. To be honest, Victoria’s comments about the place being haunted come off as jokey to me. She comes up and tries talking to Autumn, making conversation. As much as we’re meant to see Victoria as a bad person, the behaviour of both Autumn and Liam are worse, in my opinion.

Going back to the “entitled” reason, I’d like to discuss Autumn’s character a bit here. It seems to me that that Autumn shows far more feelings of entitlement than Victoria does. That’s pretty much the basis for Autumn’s entire character. I’ll explain: Autumn desperately wants to go back to New Jersey because she misses it there. However, she has no money for college. Plus, she blames her mother for spending money on the Dead and Breakfast- her college fund, in particular- when she feels that she ought to go to college instead. Let me point out that, though it is her college fund, it isn’t really her money. It’s money that her parents have been putting aside and her mother just happens to feel that it’s more important being put towards a business. Autumn has all sorts of complaints about others with this whole New Jersey thing. She blames her father for not being able to accept her back- despite the fact that he has a child on the way, which is a good enough reason for me. She hates her friend for not being able to take her in- which, I’d like to point out, she oughtn’t have to; it’s not her friend’s fault that she’s in this position. She complains at her mother for taking them to Florida in the first place. She hates the Dead and Breakfast, and any of the ideas people have to better it. Sure, Victoria might be entitled in Autumn’s mind, but Autumn is pretty much the epitome of entitled. She blames everyone else and is pretty ungrateful in general. Autumn shows much more feeling of entitlement than Victoria does.

I’m mystified as to how much Liam and Autumn really hate Victoria. If either of them really hates Victoria so much, they wouldn’t have gone to the girl’s party. Autumn even comments that Liam probably only did it to annoy Victoria. They essentially both know that they’re just going to the girl’s party to bother her and try and make her jealous. Even when they get there, there are a lot of complaints from both of them. Autumn, for example, has problems with the house being so big and there being a cover charge (which goes to charity, I’ll point out). She’s making herself miserable, and trying to make others miserable as well. The party is a particular event. It’s pretty much the epitome of all teen movies. We’re meant to think that Victoria’s cool because she’s got a mansion and catering. There’s nothing wrong with that, but I don’t see why Autumn’s meant to be surprised by any of it. Plus, it doesn’t make sense that Victoria would just push Autumn in the pool. The author has very little reason for her to do it. None of the conversations with Victoria and her friends make much sense. It’s just generic mean girl stuff, but without any point. From what the author implies, Victoria doesn’t like Autumn. Well, later scenes make it obvious- where she tries and pays Liam to stay away from Autumn. However, a lot of her behaviour suggests otherwise. If I’m honest, it kind of seems like Victoria is actually trying to befriend Autumn. She often tries to come and talk to her, even asking her about her life. Why would she ask for Autumn’s class notes, rather than someone else’s? Why would someone who supposedly dislikes Autumn so much VOLUNTARILY come up and talk to them so often?

Autumn is a quite pretentious character. She’s desperate to go to college but, for some reason, she’s definitely against community college. It seemed odd to me; she was interested in taking a journalism course, but has no experience. Going to take courses at a community college would be great to help her along that path. Yet, for some silly reason, she was quite set against it. Jennifer is her father’s girlfriend. The back-story is that the father cheated with Jennifer, Autumn’s parents got divorced and now he lives with Jennifer. They’re expecting a kid. Apparently Jennifer and Autumn are about the same age. Okay, I get that everyone dislikes her because she’s “the other woman”, but Autumn has some pretty hateful things to say about her. Again, we’re led to hate someone, despite not having the full story. There’s probably a LOT more behind the relationship, but the author just has these inane reasons for why we should hate her. Yet, Autumn makes contact with her father several times, wanting to move back into their house, despite hating Jennifer so much. That just makes no sense; she’s desperate to move in with a woman that she hates? She just expects everyone else to accommodate her wishes, no matter how difficult or expensive it is for them. Just as long as she’s happy…

It’s pretty *beeping* obvious that, if you dislike someone, you should probably stay away from them.

The actual mystery and investigation aspect were somewhat generic. Many TV shows and other books I’ve read have similar plots at times. As for supernatural aspects, I could have probably done without them. I wasn’t particularly interested in the actual supernatural happenings; I felt that they could have been better dealt with. For example, the reasoning the author gives for Autumn being able to sense the ghosts isn’t very original. It was really reminiscent of things I’ve seen in some movies and TV, even in genres such as science fiction. I’m reminded, in particular, of an episode of Stargate SG:1 where it was the explanation for certain alien appearances. The primary reason she was looking into the ghost of the ring was for a potential college opportunity. However, after the initial mentions of it, that plotline was sort of dropped. We saw her researching the ghost, yes, but we never really saw her writing any notes or an indication that she was recording this for journalism purposes. If she was planning on using any of the information, she should have been at least making sure to get some evidence of it. The plot in general is alright. However, I think that there are people who don’t get a proper introduction and there are a lot of portions that feel missing. For example, the areas where we’re meant to hate Victoria and the father’s GF. Right now, they aren’t there. Some characters get kind of lost. Timothy, for example, is a character where I just seem to miss a lot of information about him and don’t really feel like he fits in. The same can be said of the primary mystery aspect. I think, had the author focused a lot less on Victoria, and actually worked to build a better plot, we would have a much more intriguing mystery.

I didn’t particularly enjoy any of the characters. To me, the majority are just ordinary people. However, others have behaviour and feelings that don’t make sense. For example, the hatred towards Victoria and Jennifer. Autumn is just such a spiteful person and she displays such a poor attitude. Yes, I get that she hated her situation. However, she could have made the best of it. College costs a LOT, so she could have been using community college as a way to build her knowledge, and a part time job to build her funds, before heading to a more expensive place. However, for some reason, she thought that she was above that. Other characters, such as Victoria, just show such weird behaviour. I know that she’s just meant to be an antagonist, but the least the author could do is have Victoria’s actions make some sense. To me, it just looks like she was just stuck into the book to have someone to hate. As much as I appreciate the free book, I feel like it just needed a lot more work in a variety of aspects. The character behaviour/ opinions are unbelievable and the plot/ mystery aspects are generic. I first nominated it because I thought it was an interesting premise and I liked the author’s writing style in the excerpt. The thing I’m primarily disappointed at is that the rest of the novel doesn’t follow through with my expectations of an original plot and characters.
Overall, I wish I could rate it higher, but sadly I was very disappointed with it.

I obtained a free copy for nominating the book on Kindle Scout and this is an honest review.

Source:
www.goodreads.com/review/show/1919390176

Original post:
Cattereia.booklikes.com/post/1535920/book-review-dead-and-breakfast-cayo-hueso-mystery-1-by-kimberly-g-giarratano

Book Review: A/Z of Wool Embroidery

A/Z of Wool Embroidery - R. Quilters, Sue Gardner

Title: A/Z of Wool Embroidery
Edited By: Sue Gardener
Categories / Themes: Non-fiction, craft, wool, stitches, how-to, sewing, embroidery
Read: 10th February, 2017
Rating: 5 / 5
Obtained: Borrowed from my mother.
Crossposted Review to: Goodreads, Booklikes

I’ve had an interest in sewing ever since I was a kid; my mother and nanna have always tried to encourage me to be creative. Though I don’t necessarily have the money to take it up as a full-time hobby, I still like seeing the stuff that can be created. I have Pinterest boards dedicated to crafting and I adore seeing all the complex things one can make. I would say that I’m an intermediate stitcher. Personally, I think it’s best for people at a beginner or intermediate level. However, I do encourage anyone at a higher level to give it a read; there’s still a ton that I’m sure you can learn. I think this book teaches users very well. It breaks down each stitch with photographic examples and shows you how to create each one. Towards the middle of the book, it also gives examples of scenes to create, with the back dedicated to templates for the creation of such scenes. They’re mostly wildlife; animals and flowers. However, if you’re creative enough, I’m sure you can suit the templates and stitches to whatever you want to make

I know, in the title, it specifies wool. However, you can possibly do it with other mediums, such as cotton. It just depends on the pattern/ stitch you’re trying. For example, Page 41 has a tutorial on how to make pompoms. I would recommend wool for this; as it provides a fluffier result. But, if we go a few pages further to Page 44, there’s a tutorial on Roumanian Stitching. For this, I reckon it would be possible to achieve with cotton embroidery thread. Another interesting thing is that the book provides little bits of information. Pages 44 and 45 have notes on “Why Wool Shrinks” and “Caring for Wool Embroidery” respectively. I think these are good things for people to know.  I’m sure a lot of people will find these and the other notations to be quite useful.

Overall, I think it’s definitely worth 5 stars. It’s got some great information and it really gives me, as a user, the inspiration I need to create my own scenes. Obviously you won’t get perfection on the first try, but keep on practicing and I’m sure you’ll get better! I borrowed this copy from my mother; however it is certainly a book I would like to buy for myself in the future.

Source:
www.goodreads.com/review/show/1908984948?

Original post:
Cattereia.booklikes.com/post/1535530/book-review-a-z-of-wool-embroidery

Book Review: Diary of a Deadhead by Candace Carson

Diary Of A Deadhead: A Wild Magical Ride into the World of Sound and Vibration by Candace Carson (2015-06-18) - Candace Carson

Title: Diary of a Deadhead: A Wild Magical Ride Into the World of Sound and Vibration
By: Candace Carson
Categories / Themes: Non-fiction, music, Grateful Dead, autobiography, memoir
Read: 12th January, 2017
Rating: 4 / 5
Obtained: Goodreads Giveaway
Crossposted Review to: Goodreads

Candace Carson is a fan of Grateful Dead, a well known band. Diary of a Deadhead quickly goes through her life and follows her dedication to the band. From her childhood, we get a brief look into some very memorable moments in her perspective.

It wasn’t just about the Grateful Dead; it was a look into what it was like to grow up in America during those eras. I found it interesting to think about her brother, Robin and his experience with the army. I also liked getting to experience those concerts through her explanations of them; what it felt like to be there and do the same things she did. I felt it interesting as the author’s emotions changed during differing events. We get to experiences highs, lows, love and loss.

I don’t think I’ve ever heard their music, but I still found it to be an interesting read. It was a good look into the author’s life. It’s a quick book and worth the read!

I won a copy of this book via Goodreads Giveaways and these are just my honest thoughts on it.

Source:
www.goodreads.com/review/show/1626762300?

Original post:
Cattereia.booklikes.com/post/1513439/book-review-diary-of-a-deadhead-by-candace-carson

Book Review: Basic Food- A History of Nutrition by Harold Kalve

Basic Food: A Theory of Nutrition - Harold Kalve

Title: Basic Food: A History of Nutrition
By: Harold Kalve
Categories / Themes: Non-fiction, health & fitness, food, history.
Read: 12th January, 2017
Rating: 1 / 5
Obtained: Goodreads Giveaway
Crossposted Review to: Goodreads
Basic Food: A History of Nutrition by Harold Kalve is an essay that looks at the evolution of humans and the food we have eaten through time. It discusses a few diets as well as considers several nutritional benefits/ negatives of them.
It was an interesting look into history, but I felt it to be wildly inconsistent. I’ll explain using an example. The author states, on page 46, that he “started eliminating food I could not have eaten a thousand years ago, including corn (maize), corn products, and anything with corn products in it.” Moving on a sentence, he says he also cut out rice, potatoes pasta and he soon after comments that he cut out ALL grain products. To my knowledge, I was under the impression that cultures had been using corn for thousands of years. I Googled it and came up with an article from wholehealthsource.blogspot.com.au : “The first evidence of a calorically important domesticated crop I’m aware of was about 11,500 years ago in the fertile crescent. They were cultivating an early ancestor of wheat called emmer. Other grains popped up independently in what is now China (rice; ~10,000 years ago), and Central America (corn; ~9,000 years ago). That’s why people say humans have been eating grains for about 10,000 years.”
If we’re considering the foods a person could eat a thousand years ago we could still have all these things: corn, rice, other grain products, chocolate, cheese, beer… Heck, even the term “pizza” first appears in 997, according to Wikipedia / ~3000 BCE for Palm oil / ~5000 BCE: Fossilized remains of possibly cultivated potato tubers on a cave floor in Chilca Canyon.” – (Wikipedia). / “Polo ventured to China in the time of the Yuan Dynasty (1271-1368) and the Chinese had been consuming noodles as early as 3000 B.C. in the Qinghai province. There is even some evidence there of 4,000-year-old noodles made from foxtail and broomcorn millet.” – (todayifoundout.com). Breads have been around for something like 30 thousand of years, according to the bread Wikipedia article.
Articles that I just referenced:
Pasta Is Not Originally from Italy – Today I Found Out: http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2011/06/pasta-is-not-originally-from-italy/
Anyway, my point about this is that he’s judging our diets for eating things so processed and mutated. He implies that we should go back to eating the same ways that our ancestors did. My position is that humans have been eating these things for thousands of years anyway. He himself cuts grain related products out of his own diet, yet we’ve been consuming things like bread for 30,000 years. He cuts pasta out, but we’ve been eating that for 4,000 years. Humans have been processing and farming foods for thousands of years. Obviously, to produce these things, they selectively farm to improve crops. Crops then evolve based on this.
The reason the author cuts back on these foods is because of domestic farming and that these foods have been mutated a LOT in the past thousand years. However, all foods have. Whether they be meat, grain, vegetable or fruit- they’ve all gone through massive changes.
For example, carrots used to come in all sorts of colours. However, due to selective farming, we mostly have orange ones these days. Things like crops have improved yields and animals have grown to very large sizes. Sure, the author suggests really negative things about such farming practices. But it’s only going to get worse as time goes on. Crops and animals are going to keep growing in size, especially over the next century. If you don’t like the way farmers do it, the only way you can pretty much avoid this is to grow your own animals and crops.
It’s an essay about real food vs processed food. But, to me, the author’s argument seems wildly un-researched. He vilifies carbohydrates in particular, and shames a lot of grain related products. However, in my knowledge, it’s fine for people to eat grains; the problem is overindulging. He suggests cutting back on processed and modern day food. By doing this, we’re meant to go back to the same food we would have eaten a thousand years ago- yet he lists things (to avoid) that we actually did have a thousand years ago (pasta, corn, rice, etc)… Apart from it being here and there, I’m a bit mystified. We have a huge list of what to avoid, but that doesn’t leave much left for us to eat.
It has a few interesting points about human evolution, but the book is more scare tactic than proper food advice. The bottom line: if you’re worried about your food intake, make and appointment with a health professional who can tailor make a diet for you.
Note: If you also end up reading the book, I encourage you to research and form your own conclusions.
I won a copy of this book via Goodreads Giveaways and these are just my honest thoughts on it.

Source:
www.goodreads.com/review/show/1876434302?

Original post:
Cattereia.booklikes.com/post/1513426/book-review-basic-food-a-history-of-nutrition-by-harold-kalve

Book Review: Song of the Sending (The Expatriates #1) by Corinne O’Flynn

 

The Expatriates (Song of the Sending, #1) - Corinne O'Flynn

Title: Song of the Sending
By: Corinne O’Flynn
Series: The Expatriates #1
Categories / Themes: fantasy, coming of age, young adult, adventure
Read: 8th January – 12th January, 2017
Rating: 4 / 5
Obtained: Won an eBook copy via a Giveaway
Crossposted Review to: Goodreads

Song of the Sending by Corinne O’Flynn is a young adult novel, full of adventure. Despite living in a travelling carnival, James “Jim” Wales feels like he doesn’t belong there. He’s always felt as if he’s not from the Modern World. One day, he receives a bird messenger, carrying a note from someone he believed to be long gone. Black Riders soon attack the carnival, led by a terrorist named Eldred. He is what is known as a Scholar, born with a symbol. As it turns out, Jim has a similar one. He is the one that Eldred hunts.

I wasn’t impressed with Jim. He’s an alright character, but he’s kind of dull and the situations surrounding his life aren’t the most original. Many are reminiscent of other young adult series that I’ve experienced. I thought that many of the foreground characters had interesting points to them. However, I felt like the author could have cut back a few characters. A lot of background characters were mentioned, despite having no part to play in the book. I wasn’t a fan of the Jim / Charlie relationship; it didn’t seem like a very important part to the plot, in my opinion. I can appreciate that he has feelings for her, but I think he had better things to think about and (to me) it kind of seemed disrespectful to the people who had died. I didn’t really like Sam; as a character, some of his comments seemed depressing and I felt like some of his actions only served to make him seem like a third wheel.

I didn’t necessarily appreciate all of the magical happenings. Charlie’s magical power development seemed odd as she had no indication of it before going across the bridge. It did have an important part to play in the book, but I think it could have been better explained. I appreciate that there are differences between Bellenor and the Modern World, but a bunch of things don’t make sense. For example, Bellenor and the “Modern World” were separated centuries ago due to the “Great Shift”. The Modern World has advanced to present day, with Bellenor stuck in some kind of medieval/ Middle Ages setting- or so it appears to the characters. Why has Bellenor not advanced from that point in time? More to the point, why are they able to understand each other so easily? Not to mention, the people are speaking English, no less. In centuries, the English language has changed a LOT as it’s taken on new words from all sorts of countries and it mutates day to day, depending on slang and new inventions. However, the people in Bellenor speak modern day English, but that doesn’t make sense; they would have a lot of differing cultures depending on their own people. So, although they have travellers from the Modern World, they would likely have their own language. I could understand similarities, but not the exact same language. I think that some other things are unclear as well. In the beginning, it almost seems as if Jim has little knowledge of Bellenor. Yet, later on, he seems to have more knowledge of it- and the events during the family’s departure- than others have.

Overall, it was fairly well developed and I can see that the author has put a lot of details into even small, unimportant things such as background characters. Not all of it works out, in my opinion; I feel like some of it is unnecessary. However, I admire the author’s dedication to building such a comprehensive introduction to the series. Whilst I wasn’t a fan of many characters or all of their actions, I found that there were some intriguing points to their personalities and some of the choices they made.

I won an eBook copy of this book via a Giveaway and these are just my honest thoughts on it.

Source:
www.goodreads.com/review/show/1872452563?

Original post:
Cattereia.booklikes.com/post/1513046/book-review-song-of-the-sending-the-expatriates-1-by-corinne-o-flynn

Book Review: What If by Chrystine Alyx

What If - Chrystine Alyx

Title: What If
By: Chrystine Alyx
Categories / Themes: mystery, romance, searching for a missing person.
Read: 08th January to 10th January, 2017
Rating: 2 / 5
Obtained: Goodreads Giveaway
Crossposted Review to: Goodreads

This book by Chrystine Alyx is a story that questions “What If” Dana, a main character, had taken an opportunity with someone else rather than marrying her husband. She asks Mattie, a co-worker, to research what happened with Jamie- the “other”.

The plot is quite alright. It has an interesting premise and I like that there’s a mystery behind it. I felt that the mystery aspects could have been better plotted, however. I’ve been reading and watching mysteries for years. This one seemed reminiscent of many ones that I’ve experienced before. As I read on, I don’t feel that “What If” is an appropriate title. Yes, Dana wonders “what if I had gone with Jamie rather than getting married?” But the book doesn’t really focus on Dana; it focuses more on Mattie, the person who is actually tracking Jamie down. Mattie doesn’t really imagine “what if” in the way the title means; she wasn’t the one involved in the scenario and didn’t even know Jamie personally.

There were far too many characters for my liking. I didn’t keep up with them all, I’ll admit; I lost track because there were just so many. Many of them didn’t get a proper introduction. I was mystified as to who Janet and Jamie were for a substantial amount of the book, despite both of them being quite important to the plot. I also didn’t feel that Dana really did like Jamie’s company; the flashbacks didn’t seem reminiscent of some inspiring relationship. It just seemed like an ordinary seen. My thought is that she was just romanticising the moments they spent together.

I think that, primarily, the author just needs to tighten up her writing style. The majority of the book is very convoluted. It has a lot of characters and scenes which I feel were unnecessary. For example, the entire plot line with Mattie’s sister’s pregnancy turned out to be kind of meaningless to me. The same with the entire character of Dana. Despite her “What If” question being the premise of the entire book, I think that she was kind of useless and only served as a person to shame and blame for things. If she was so interested in finding this Jamie, than why couldn’t she track the girl down herself? Sure, Mattie has experience in doing it, but if Dana was so interested, than she could have done it herself. This supposed interest just baffles me because she didn’t really seem to care that much about finding Jamie, despite the way the author makes it seem…

Overall, I felt it turned out okay. It was an interesting mystery, but I felt that a lot of characters could have been dropped and the mystery improved.

I won a copy of this book via a First Reads giveaway and these are just my honest thoughts on it.

Source:
www.goodreads.com/review/show/1822788826

Original post:
Cattereia.booklikes.com/post/1512726/what-if-by-chrystine-alyx

Book Review: Band-Aids, Bullet Holes and Bleeding Words by Carina Pellius

 photo Band-Aids Bullet Holes and Bleeding Words by Carina Pellius.jpg Title: Band-Aids, Bullet Holes and Bleeding Words
By: Carina Pellius
Categories / Themes: poetry, love, death, life.
Read: 15th November, 2016 – 18th November, 2016
Rating: 5 / 5
Obtained: Goodreads
Crossposted Review to: Goodreads

Band-Aids, Bullet Holes and Bleeding Words is a selection of poems by Carina Pellius. They were written since age 11 to present day. Many of the works feature some sort of taboo topic, including (but not limited to) abortion, euthanasia and suicide.

There’s no definite organisation that I can see and it kind of works well for the book. We begin the book with some fairly innocent poems, then we read into some eye-popping numbers, after which we go back to some fairly tame works. My favourite of the included poems is definitely “Who do you see?” on page 49 (it might vary in other editions, for future reference). It spans three pages and asks the reader to consider their appearance. How does it differ from the models and popular people that you might see on TV and in shop windows? It asks for you to consider how the media uses bullying to change and manipulate you. In my opinion, it has some honest and blatant points about appearance. I think the strangest poem is “I need to pee” on page 55. Though quite a real experience for many involved, it gave me quite a laugh. A bonus favourite is the untitled work on page 59 about long distance relationships; I appreciate the warm feelings it evoked from me. Not everyone thinks that long distance relationships will work, and I appreciate the happy and optimistic outlook on the matter.

The innocent ones are fairly simplistic and give a good example of youth and naivety. Others are kind of disturbing. I’m not offended by them, I would like to mention. However, they are fairly graphic and feature some strong themes such as domestic abuse, abortion, suicidal intentions and euthanasia (and that’s just to name a few). I certainly do appreciate these works; I like the way Pellius has thought to include such startling examples of life and death. It’s nice to see that she isn’t afraid to write about such things or to try and hide away her feelings on the matters at hand. Mind you, I’d like to also point out that not everyone is going to agree with the themes or the way the characters deal with such situations. Just be warned that you might take offense or be upset by some of the opinions and events. In that respect, I also think it’s good to show such a wide range of situations that many will relate to. These days, many people will have experiences with things like suicide and domestic violence. Even if not in person, many people have seen example of such things on television. Even if you can’t relate to the poetry, I think that Pellius has written good stories of the scenarios. Many of these poems are like little short stories with special characters and she evokes some pretty powerful scenes from them.

Aside from the poems dealing with taboo topics, there are some really special portions. They are sweet moments that bring a smile to my face. Some of them are untitled and featured in between other works. There are also some very considerate poems such as “Sister”.

I think it’s one of the more stark poetry books I’ve read over the years. It really does have some additions that make you think “aww” or “wow!” Many might be turned off by certain themes, but I really do appreciate the insights Pellius has to offer. The writing style the author uses is easy to understand and she uses some well contorted sentences that make many portions really powerful and emotional. Even if you don’t read much poetry, the book is definitely worth a read.

I won a copy of this book via Goodreads Giveaways and these are just my honest thoughts on it.